Watershed planning permission granted for 10,000 homes and infrastructure – what happens next?

  • East Herts Council grants planning permission for 10,000 homes and infrastructure at Gilston 
  • The Gilston Area development is a major challenge for existing communities
  • The Parish Councils of Eastwick & Gilston and Hunsdon, through the Neighbourhood Plan Group, will continue to be a voice for residents
  • The Group will work with the two developers seeking to keep them accountable for their promises to create a sustainable, high-quality development that also respects local heritage and environmental goals

The Hunsdon, Eastwick and Gilston Neighbourhood Plan Group (HEGNPG) has pledged to continue working to represent all residents after East Herts Council confirmed the grant of planning permissions for 10,000 homes and infrastructure.

These outline planning permissions for 8,500 homes for Places for People across six villages and 1,500 homes for Taylor Wimpey in a seventh village follow the earlier granting of permission for major transport infrastructure known as Central and Eastern Stort Crossing.

Anthony Bickmore, Chair of the HEGNPG, said:

“The Planning Permissions for the Gilston Area development of 10,000 homes over the next 20 years represents a major challenge for the Hunsdon, Eastwick and Gilston Communities.

“The Hunsdon, Eastwick, and Gilston Neighbourhood Plan Group has played a crucial role in trying to shape the development to ensure it aligns with community values including sustainable development principles.

“HEGNPG developed with the Community an Award winning Neighbourhood Plan (GANP) which was adopted following a massive vote by the community to support it. The Group continues to speak for both Parish Councils and engage with the developers, Places for People and Taylor Wimpey, and East Herts Council who have formally granted the Planning Consents after six years of public consultations with us and others.

“There is much more we would have liked to have seen but our primary goals now are to advocate for high standards of urban design, proper and timely infrastructure, environmental responsibility and community-focused development while managing the impacts of this massive project on residents over many decades.”

He added: “The HEGNPG will continue to be involved in reviewing further planning applications and master plans for the proposed villages, of which there will be many. The group will work to ensure these applications and plans meet the standards outlined in the GANP.

“The group’s focus spans multiple areas, such as safeguarding green space and community land, ensuring biodiversity, implementing sustainable transport solutions, and promoting ‘village master planning’ principles and creating balanced communities with affordable housing. These principles dictate that each village within the development retains distinct, community-oriented features.

“Additionally, we intend to actively monitor the agreements related to infrastructure, affordable housing and the long-term governance of community assets. This is a watershed moment and we have to accept that the development is going to happen but the HEGNPG’s role is to act as a voice for residents, holding developers accountable to promises of sustainable, high-quality development that respects both local heritage and environmental goals.

“Through this active role, we aim to keep the development aligned with the community’s vision and ensure it remains adaptable to future needs. If done well the old and the new communities will be able to thrive together. This is now what the local Parish Councils and their residents want to see achieved.”

Notes to Editors

Representing the joint Parish Councils of Eastwick & Gilston and Hunsdon, and made up of local people from the area planned for the Gilston Area development of 10,000 houses over the next 20 years, The HEGNPG has, since 2016, sought to reflect the views of residents now and into the future on East Herts housing plans for the area.

After several rounds of public consultation, the HEGNPG’s Gilston Area Neighbourhood Plan passed its independent examination in February 2021 and was endorsed at referendum in May 2021 with 97.8% of the vote in favour on a high 37.20% turnout. The Plan went on to win national awards from the industry’s leading national Planning Awards and the Excellence in Landscape Planning and Assessment Award from the Landscape Institute.

Following adoption of the Plan, the HEGNPG has continued its dialogue with the council and developers to speak on behalf of residents.

Contact:

For further information on the Hunsdon, Eastwick and Gilston Neighbourhood Plan Group, hi-res images or interviews please contact us via email at: heg.npg@gmail.com or mayer.nissim@gmail.com

Other information also available at: http://www.hegnp.org.uk

General Election 2024 – Candidates answer questions on Gilston Area

On July 4, 2024, residents of the Hertford & Stortford constituency will vote for their representative in Parliament as part of the 2024 General Election.

This constituency includes the area covered by the Gilston Area development.

Your Neighbourhood Plan Group asked the following four questions to all seven candidates standing for election.

  • How do you anticipate being able to support residents’ ambitions to secure a high-quality development?
  • Will you champion the provision, by the developers, the NHS and service providers like Thames Water, of the community infrastructure needed by the development?
  • The community has prepared two neighbourhood plans (The Gilston Area Neighbourhood Plan and Hunsdon Area Neighbourhood Plan), will you support the delivery of these plans and ensure that the voice of the community is not ignored but properly listened to by East Herts DC and the developers?
  • The green belt was released to provide housing including 40% affordable housing although this target has been reduced to 23% (loss of 1,700 affordable homes); what steps do you think you will be able to take to secure an increase in affordable housing for local people?

Below we publish their responses in full. We have listed the candidates and their responses in alphabetical order

John Burmicz (Reform UK)

 1. How do you anticipate being able to support residents’ ambitions to secure a high-quality development?

I will fight hammer and tong for this.  We live in a wonderful area and because of the housing policy of the last administration in EHDC, so much has been signed over for development and the developments that I have seen so far beggar belief.  EHDC is short of everything.  There are no real enforcement officers so the builders build what they like where they like.  Affordable housing?  Where is that? 

    I am willing to be proven wrong but I had the feeling that buildings were thrown up purely to generate Council Tax income.  The developments that I have seen, particularly on West Road have been put up without much consideration for the residents already there from what I have heard and seen.  The existing residents at the end of the original housing line should be talked to and asked for their views.  Makes for interesting information.  People who have been there for 50 years plus cannot open their bedroom curtains as they are overlooked by new housing (not my words).  We ned to keep on at EHDC to get some of this sorted, especially infrastructure.

    2. Will you champion the provision, by the developers, the NHS and service providers like Thames Water, of the community infrastructure needed by the development?

    In my view, infrastructure should have been put in first.  Once the roads and bus routes are laid on then you can start digging.  Saying that there is a train station at Harlow town to cope with commuter traffic into London is useless.   They say the same about Sawbridgeworth Train Station.

      Don’t forget, all these developments seem to be viewed in isolation.  This is a gross error.  There are prospective developments in Hatfield Heath,  Keksys Farm and so on that all somehow quote the same resources available to prospective purchasers of new builds.

      The developers have to make assurances that infrastructure will be there prior to the start of any building.  PAH can’t cope now.  There are 000’s more houses going to be built.  Then what?  Where are the schools going to be?  Where is the water supply coming from?  Where is the power coming from?  Gas supplies? 

      I will certainly do my utmost to get some sense into this argument as we will end up with a blob of houses running from Harlow to Bishop Stortford and possibly beyond.

      Do we know what has been signed up for with the former head of the EHDC, the charming Mrs Linda Haysey?

      3. The community has prepared two neighbourhood plans… will you support the delivery of these plans and ensure that the voice of the community is not ignored but properly listened to by East Herts DC and the developers?

      I have not seen the plans for the area but if I can see them they I will be on the side of the existing residents to make sure that developments are where they should be and not just placed at random locations and that we don’t just have development for development’s sake.  Unlike the current MP, I do actually live here and want to keep some semblance of the charm that our locality has

      4… What steps do you think you will be able to take to secure an increase in affordable housing for local people?

      The only way to stop this shift in agreed planned development is to halt the licenses to build.  Are there any reasons given for the drop in the number of affordable houses?  DO WE HAVE THESE IN WRITING?  IF NOT, WHY NOT?   You have to understand that it is not in the interest of the builders to put effort into low cost housing.  Base costs are the same for a normal or affordable house.  If I was a cynical person, and I am not, I would also suggest that Council Tax revenues from low cost housing are not returning the sort of revenues that EHDC is after.  A blind eye to the developments?   I may of course be completely wrong.  Happy to be proven so.

        Helen Campbell (Liberal Democrats)

        1. How do you anticipate being able to support residents’ ambitions to secure a high-quality development?

        High-quality developments mean homes of the right variety of type and size, ample green space and enhanced biodiversity, sensible road layouts with plenty of pathways and cycle routes linking roads into, out of and within the development, and the community infrastructure that means residents don’t have to get in their cars to get to school, go shopping, or seek recreation and fresh air. We need developments that are not ‘add ons’ but which have their own community heart so they become neighbourhoods in their own right, well-connected by bus links.

        I know from talking to residents across the constituency that they are fed up of new developments with limited facilities, meagre green spaces, a lack of things such as play areas and, of course, the education and healthcare provision that everybody needs. Building developments like that doesn’t help with congestion and air quality, important issues that people in the constituency tell me are amongst their chief concerns.

        Sadly, we have a top down developer-led planning system in this country, which does not allow the building of the homes we so desperately need to address the housing crisis while ensuring the infrastructure needs are met at the same time. This must change. Liberal Democrats want a much more localised approach that puts the power in the hands of the local community, not the developers.

        We will:

        Build the quality homes people desperately need, with meaningful community engagement, by:

        • Expanding Neighbourhood Planning across England.
        • Properly funding local planning departments to improve planning outcomes and ensure housing is not built in areas of high flood risk without adequate mitigation, by allowing local authorities to set their own fees.
        • Ensuring that all development has appropriate infrastructure, services and amenities in place, by integrating infrastructure and public service delivery into the planning process.
        • Trialling Community Land Auctions to ensure that local communities receive a fair share of the benefits of new development in their areas and to help fund vital local services.
        • Encouraging development of existing brownfield sites with financial incentives and ensuring that affordable and social housing is included in these projects.
        • Putting the construction sector on a sustainable footing by investing in skills, training and new technologies such as modern methods of construction.
        • Making homes warmer and cheaper to heat with a ten-year emergency upgrade programme, and ensure that all new homes are zero-carbon.

        2. Will you champion the provision, by the developers, the NHS and service providers like Thames Water, of the community infrastructure needed by the development?

        Yes. As above, the right infrastructure is absolutely vital.

        3. The community has prepared two neighbourhood plans… will you support the delivery of these plans and ensure that the voice of the community is not ignored but properly listened to by East Herts DC and the developers?

        I will always support developments that meet the challenges described above, that help meet our increasingly pressing housing need, and that have local support.

        4. … What steps do you think you will be able to take to secure an increase in affordable housing for local people?

        Like many people, I was dismayed when the affordable housing element was reduced, under the previous Conservative administration.

        To aid affordable housing provision, Liberal Democrats champion the maximum possible use of brownfield sites wherever possible, and a maximisation of affordable and social housing on those sites.

        Wherever homes are built, we have committed to making homes warmer and cheaper to heat with a ten-year emergency upgrade programme, as well as ensuring that all new homes are zero-carbon.

        We’ll remove dangerous cladding from all buildings, while ensuring that leaseholders do not have to pay a penny towards it.

        We will help people who struggle to afford a deposit to own their own homes by introducing a new Rent to Own model for social housing where rent payments give tenants an increasing stake in the property, owning it outright after 30 years.

        Nick Cox (Green Party)

        1. How do you anticipate being able to support residents’ ambitions to secure a high-quality development?

        As both your MP and a district councillor I would be in a unique position to lobby and influence from multiple directions and this issue will remain in my in-tray for as long as necessary.

        2. Will you champion the provision, by the developers, the NHS and service providers like Thames Water, of the community infrastructure needed by the development?

        Yes, I am doing so already, and will continue to do so.

        3. The community has prepared two neighbourhood plans… will you support the delivery of these plans and ensure that the voice of the community is not ignored but properly listened to by East Herts DC and the developers?

        If I have learnt anything during my time as a district councillor, it is to avoid the word “ensure”, but I am happy to promise that I will commit to doing everything within my power.

        4. … What steps do you think you will be able to take to secure an increase in affordable housing for local people?

        The lack of affordable and social housing is a national disgrace and I will be lobbying Sir Keir’s Labour government to tackle the housing crisis. I don’t believe that green belt releases should be the solution. I believe in better use of brown field, ending the abhorrent practice of keeping homes empty to increase profits, and by driving foreign buy to let investors and other property speculators out of the domestic housing market.

        Josh Dean (Labour Party)

        1. How do you anticipate being able to support residents’ ambitions to secure a high-quality development?

        As planning falls under the remit of the district council and, indeed, this development requires collaboration between a number of local authorities, it’s essential that any MP builds a strong relationship with the local authority and residential stakeholders. That is exactly what I would do as our MP.

        Labour wants exemplary development to be the norm not the exception and in government we will take steps to ensure that we are building more high-quality, well-designed and sustainable homes and creating places that increase climate resilience and promote nature recovery.

        2. Will you champion the provision, by the developers, the NHS and service providers like Thames Water, of the community infrastructure needed by the development?

        It’s important that the growth of our infrastructure matches pace with the growth of our communities – this is something I have advocated for in the past and something I would advocate for if I am elected as our MP.

        4…. What steps do you think you will be able to take to secure an increase in affordable housing for local people?

        We desperately need more affordable housing in our communities as well as social housing to hep cut the waiting list. Like you, I’m concerned that the affordable housing target has been reduced to 23%. Labour has committed to strengthening planning obligations to ensure new developments provide more affordable homes and changing the Affordable Homes Programme to ensure that it delivers more homes from existing funding.


        I appreciate that I haven’t been able to go into as much detail as I would like at this time. What I can promise is that I will always seek to engage in good faith with local residents on this issue and, if I am privileged enough to be elected as our MP on 4th July, I will prioritise holding an open meeting with local residents so we can have a longer discussion about this development, their views and how we can work together.

        Jane Maria Fowler (Alliance for Democracy and Freedom)

        To be totally honest I was against the development from the start.  We are losing far too much green space at an alarming rate as it is, and the amount of proposed houses to be built is huge and quite frankly frightening.

        As you may or may not be aware I am very new to politics and learning new things everyday, so please forgive me as I do not have the answers you are looking for today and would have to do some research into the development.

        If I was fortunate enough to be elected I would definitely support the community in all 4 points that have been raised.  I am particularly saddened to see the reduction in affordable housing and I would really get behind a campaign to reverse this decision as the lack of affordable housing for local people is one of reasons I decided to stand.

        Hopefully whoever gets elected will pledge to help you and oversee the development making sure that you their constituents are happy that the points raised have been successfully implemented.

        Barry Hensall (Heritage Party)

        I understand the importance of your issues, however because of the amount of mail arriving I impress upon you to read our Manifesto that I whole heartedly support / agree with and hope this answers your questions.

        I do hope you will put your trust in us, as by voting for the old LibLabCon party will just mean all will just stay the same or worse.

        Julie Marson (Conservative Party)

        1. How do you anticipate being able to support residents’ ambitions to secure a high-quality development?

        I completely understand residents concern about the impacts that this development will have on landscape, the environment, and local heritage and existing communities. We are so lucky to live in an area that benefits from both rural beauty and farming as well as fantastic connections to urban areas like Cambridge and London. This is not something that I want to see blighted by ill thought out and rash developments. I will support the residents’ ambitions to see a high-quality development built by delivering on the Conservative manifesto promise to make sure that local authorities use the new Infrastructure Levy to deliver GP surgeries, roads, schools, and other local infrastructure. I echo the promise that we will not allow these funds to be spent on projects that bear no relation to support for new homes. I have a track record of action in this area, as I have raised issues with the Secretary of State (including supporting three call in requests) and successive Housing ministers in order to make sure that the ambitions and voices of constituents are fully heard and reflected in projects like these.

        2. Will you champion the provision, by the developers, the NHS and service providers like Thames Water, of the community infrastructure needed by the development?

        Developments like the Harlow and Gilston Garden Town will not be successful without the implementation of community infrastructure that supports it. Residents living in the development deserve equal access to services such as healthcare and education. I will hold developers account to their promises to make sure that both the residents of the Garden Town are adequately supported, but also to ensure that the quality of life for residents of the surrounding areas is not disrupted. I have a track record of action and support and have always sought to represent constituents – and the Gilston Garden Town development is no exception to this.

        3. The community has prepared two neighbourhood plans… will you support the delivery of these plans and ensure that the voice of the community is not ignored but properly listened to by East Herts DC and the developers?

        Over the last 4 and a half years I have worked with local authorities in other areas of the constituency in cases like this to ensure that the voices of local residents are heard. I have been working to secure a solution at Rush Green roundabout near Hertford to ameliorate traffic issues. Similarly, I vehemently oppose the proposed commercial development at the St James’ Park site in Bishop’s Stortford, echoing sentiments of local residents regarding concerns of health and safety. I have also been pressuring Frontier to follow through on their commitment to build a GP surgery for the residents of Stortford Fields as promised, speaking in Westminster and questioning the Health Minister on this matter. I will do the same for the residents of the existing communities around the Gilston development.

        4. … What steps do you think you will be able to take to secure an increase in affordable housing for local people?

        As a nation, we need more sustainably built housing so the next generation will be able to work for the privilege of becoming homeowners. Since 2010, the Conservatives have delivered over 696,100 new affordable homes, including over 482,000 affordable homes for rent, of which over 172,600 homes for social rent. We will continue with measures like cutting stamp duty and government backed Help to Buy schemes, making it easier for local people to get on the housing ladder. We will renew the Affordable Homes Programme which allocates grant funding to Housing Associations and Local Authorities to help mitigate the costs of developing affordable homes.

        Residents’ update – November 2023

        As you may know, your Neighbourhood Plan Group wrote to Secretary of State Michael Gove in March 2023 requesting that he “call-in” the decisions by East Herts Council that month to wave through the outline planning applications for 10,000 homes in Gilston, and instead put them to a public enquiry. 

        You can download and read our letter here, where we underlined that we’re far from NIMBYs or a “protest group” trying to block the principle of this development. We’re essentially a collection of local residents who want this development to be the best it can be. We’re also a group founded by your elected parish councillors who have developed a Neighbourhood Plan backed by an overwhelming majority at referendum.

        It’s sadly a fact that the plans from Places for People and Taylor Wimpey do not properly respect the principles on which the Green Belt land was released, nor the policies of your Neighbourhood Plan. The proposed affordable housing numbers have been slashed, while the plans also ignore the concerns of the existing community and pose a very real threat to local NHS services.

        Disappointingly our call-in request has been refused by Mr Gove. The reasoning provided was: “The Government remains committed to giving more power to councils and communities to make their own decisions on planning issues and believe that planning decisions should be made at the local level wherever possible.”

        Since we requested the “call-in” in March a lot has happened:

        1. A review has been undertaken of the Developers’ crucial financial viability assessment. The previous assessment led to the cutback of 1,700 affordable homes and contributions developers have to make to support the project, but the new review argues that there is an apparent disparity of as much as £411 million. That’s enough not just to reinstate the 1,700 affordable homes but also deliver a huge amount of additional community infrastructure.
        2. In May, the voters of East Herts kicked out the Conservatives and voted in a new coalition of Greens and Liberal Democrats to run the council. The residents of Hunsdon, Eastwick & Gilston were at the forefront of this electoral shift. The new administration has been in control for over six months and is no doubt still finding its feet. However, so far they have shown no inclination to influence the Gilston planning process, to reflect the disquiet of the voters with the old council’s decisions. Councillors can ask to be briefed about S106 obligations (the agreement between a developer and a local planning authority about measures that they must take to reduce their impact on the community) being agreed and verify that the best decisions are made in the interest of the local area, existing and future residents.
        3. Meanwhile, Places for People and Taylor Wimpey are pressing on with their plans for the Gilston Area. The next step is Masterplanning. This is the key opportunity in the process for our communities to engage and contribute to what the new villages and their surroundings will look like. The NPG will be pressing for the implementation of the housing policies in the Neighbourhood Plan but everybody should feel free to go along to see for themselves and give the developers your views. 

        Within the Gilston Area, communities are very well-informed and have demonstrated time and again that they understand local issues and local character very well. You have always turned out in great numbers when there was a genuine will to listen and move forward. 

        Local people care about their environment, and about what makes the area special. Change is inevitable, but it does not have to happen by making Gilston like everywhere else. The Neighbourhood Plan you voted for summarises many of the aspirations of the local community, and the consideration of its policies are a way to deliver the development quality the area deserves.

        We invite residents to get in touch with council Leader, Ben Crystall, and also their local councillors and remind them that there are opportunities to improve this development.

        We would urge you to remind Mr Crystall that it would be proper to bring back some of the key decision making to the council’s Development Management Committee, rather than giving it all up to Officers who aren’t so accountable to local people as your elected Councillors.

        As your Neighbourhood Plan Group, we also call on Ben Crystall to re-examine the Financial Viability Case put forward by the Developers, in the light of the recent Review, and see why 1,700 Affordable Homes and other contributions have been lost to East Herts. Time is short for this to be done but it is not too late if they act promptly.

        The opportunity for further scrutiny should not be passed by, and councillors have the power to ask further questions and ensure that, both for the current and all future viability checks, the accepted original assumptions are verified and put to the test.

        The people of East Herts can still have a say, if you email:

        Please don’t delay.

        Anthony Bickmore – Chair, Hunsdon, Eastwick and Gilston Neighbourhood Plan Group

        November 2, 2023

        A fresh start and alternative vision for Gilston? Have your say!

        Join us at 10.30am on Saturday, July 1 at The Plume of Feathers in Gilston

        The Neighbourhood Plan Group is making a vital attempt to improve and change the proposed new housing developments by asking the Government to “call in” the planning application for review.

        If this happens we need to give a real example of what we think “good” looks like

        Whatever the outcome of the Call-in, a community-backed alternative plan should feed key inputs into the developers’ masterplanning for the project.

        This event is being facilitated by planning and design experts Create Streets.

        Why are we doing this now?

        The recent change in the makeup of East Herts Council offers a real chance to get our voices heard.

        It’s no secret that a driving reason for the electoral shift is your dissatisfaction with the planning process and outcomes for local developments, especially those planned in Hunsdon, Eastwick and Gilston.

        Residents had no choice but to accept the District Plan, which provided for the release of Green Belt land for 10,000 homes, with the promise of a development of exceptional quality and 1,000 acres of community-owned space in return.

        In the years since this decision was made, the developers have been allowed to go back on their promises when it comes to affordable housing, the mitigation of impacts on existing communities, and the timely provision of adequate infrastructure to new and existing residents.

        Despite this the previous Planning Committee of the council waved through the Outline Planning Applications, overruling the Neighbourhood Plan that you voted for by an overwhelming majority.

        Can we really change anything?

        Your Neighbourhood Plan Group has petitioned the Secretary of State to “call-in” this decision, as we’ve not been happy with how the council has approached it. We’ll keep on pushing on your behalf for this to happen and let you know the results of these efforts.

        The District Plan can’t be overturned, and it’s still much more likely than not that the development will go ahead in some form – but the shifting political landscape on both a national and local level has opened the door for a fresh look at the project.

        We’ve been approached by the Create Streets research institute, who want to help us come up with and develop our thinking for what might be within a future Masterplan – as one that chimes with the Neighbourhood Plan policies, and one that actually delivers on those promises of seven distinct villages that respond to the Hertfordshire landscape, rather than a road-led suburban sprawl.

        With your help, we want to develop this Masterplan – one that comes from you, the residents – to present to the new East Herts Council and, possibly, the Secretary of State to show that another way is possible.

        Please come along, and bring your neighbours and local friends and family.

         – Hunsdon, Eastwick and Gilston Neighbourhood Plan Group