On July 4, 2024, residents of the Hertford & Stortford constituency will vote for their representative in Parliament as part of the 2024 General Election.

This constituency includes the area covered by the Gilston Area development.

Your Neighbourhood Plan Group asked the following four questions to all seven candidates standing for election.

• How do you anticipate being able to support residents’ ambitions to secure a high-quality development?
• Will you champion the provision, by the developers, the NHS and service providers like Thames Water, of the community infrastructure needed by the development?
• The community has prepared two neighbourhood plans (The Gilston Area Neighbourhood Plan and Hunsdon Area Neighbourhood Plan), will you support the delivery of these plans and ensure that the voice of the community is not ignored but properly listened to by East Herts DC and the developers?
• The green belt was released to provide housing including 40% affordable housing although this target has been reduced to 23% (loss of 1,700 affordable homes); what steps do you think you will be able to take to secure an increase in affordable housing for local people?

Below we publish their responses in full. We have listed the candidates and their responses in alphabetical order

John Burmicz (Reform UK)

 1. How do you anticipate being able to support residents’ ambitions to secure a high-quality development?

I will fight hammer and tong for this.  We live in a wonderful area and because of the housing policy of the last administration in EHDC, so much has been signed over for development and the developments that I have seen so far beggar belief.  EHDC is short of everything.  There are no real enforcement officers so the builders build what they like where they like.  Affordable housing?  Where is that? 

I am willing to be proven wrong but I had the feeling that buildings were thrown up purely to generate Council Tax income.  The developments that I have seen, particularly on West Road have been put up without much consideration for the residents already there from what I have heard and seen.  The existing residents at the end of the original housing line should be talked to and asked for their views.  Makes for interesting information.  People who have been there for 50 years plus cannot open their bedroom curtains as they are overlooked by new housing (not my words).  We ned to keep on at EHDC to get some of this sorted, especially infrastructure.

2. Will you champion the provision, by the developers, the NHS and service providers like Thames Water, of the community infrastructure needed by the development?

In my view, infrastructure should have been put in first.  Once the roads and bus routes are laid on then you can start digging.  Saying that there is a train station at Harlow town to cope with commuter traffic into London is useless.   They say the same about Sawbridgeworth Train Station.

Don’t forget, all these developments seem to be viewed in isolation.  This is a gross error.  There are prospective developments in Hatfield Heath,  Keksys Farm and so on that all somehow quote the same resources available to prospective purchasers of new builds.

The developers have to make assurances that infrastructure will be there prior to the start of any building.  PAH can’t cope now.  There are 000’s more houses going to be built.  Then what?  Where are the schools going to be?  Where is the water supply coming from?  Where is the power coming from?  Gas supplies? 

I will certainly do my utmost to get some sense into this argument as we will end up with a blob of houses running from Harlow to Bishop Stortford and possibly beyond.

Do we know what has been signed up for with the former head of the EHDC, the charming Mrs Linda Haysey?

3. The community has prepared two neighbourhood plans… will you support the delivery of these plans and ensure that the voice of the community is not ignored but properly listened to by East Herts DC and the developers?

I have not seen the plans for the area but if I can see them they I will be on the side of the existing residents to make sure that developments are where they should be and not just placed at random locations and that we don’t just have development for development’s sake.  Unlike the current MP, I do actually live here and want to keep some semblance of the charm that our locality has

4… What steps do you think you will be able to take to secure an increase in affordable housing for local people?

The only way to stop this shift in agreed planned development is to halt the licenses to build.  Are there any reasons given for the drop in the number of affordable houses?  DO WE HAVE THESE IN WRITING?  IF NOT, WHY NOT?   You have to understand that it is not in the interest of the builders to put effort into low cost housing.  Base costs are the same for a normal or affordable house.  If I was a cynical person, and I am not, I would also suggest that Council Tax revenues from low cost housing are not returning the sort of revenues that EHDC is after.  A blind eye to the developments?   I may of course be completely wrong.  Happy to be proven so.

Helen Campbell (Liberal Democrats)

1. How do you anticipate being able to support residents’ ambitions to secure a high-quality development?

High-quality developments mean homes of the right variety of type and size, ample green space and enhanced biodiversity, sensible road layouts with plenty of pathways and cycle routes linking roads into, out of and within the development, and the community infrastructure that means residents don’t have to get in their cars to get to school, go shopping, or seek recreation and fresh air. We need developments that are not ‘add ons’ but which have their own community heart so they become neighbourhoods in their own right, well-connected by bus links.

I know from talking to residents across the constituency that they are fed up of new developments with limited facilities, meagre green spaces, a lack of things such as play areas and, of course, the education and healthcare provision that everybody needs. Building developments like that doesn’t help with congestion and air quality, important issues that people in the constituency tell me are amongst their chief concerns.

Sadly, we have a top down developer-led planning system in this country, which does not allow the building of the homes we so desperately need to address the housing crisis while ensuring the infrastructure needs are met at the same time. This must change. Liberal Democrats want a much more localised approach that puts the power in the hands of the local community, not the developers.

We will:

Build the quality homes people desperately need, with meaningful community engagement, by:

• Expanding Neighbourhood Planning across England.
• Properly funding local planning departments to improve planning outcomes and ensure housing is not built in areas of high flood risk without adequate mitigation, by allowing local authorities to set their own fees.
• Ensuring that all development has appropriate infrastructure, services and amenities in place, by integrating infrastructure and public service delivery into the planning process.
• Trialling Community Land Auctions to ensure that local communities receive a fair share of the benefits of new development in their areas and to help fund vital local services.
• Encouraging development of existing brownfield sites with financial incentives and ensuring that affordable and social housing is included in these projects.
• Putting the construction sector on a sustainable footing by investing in skills, training and new technologies such as modern methods of construction.
• Making homes warmer and cheaper to heat with a ten-year emergency upgrade programme, and ensure that all new homes are zero-carbon.

2. Will you champion the provision, by the developers, the NHS and service providers like Thames Water, of the community infrastructure needed by the development?

Yes. As above, the right infrastructure is absolutely vital.

3. The community has prepared two neighbourhood plans… will you support the delivery of these plans and ensure that the voice of the community is not ignored but properly listened to by East Herts DC and the developers?

I will always support developments that meet the challenges described above, that help meet our increasingly pressing housing need, and that have local support.

4. … What steps do you think you will be able to take to secure an increase in affordable housing for local people?

Like many people, I was dismayed when the affordable housing element was reduced, under the previous Conservative administration.

To aid affordable housing provision, Liberal Democrats champion the maximum possible use of brownfield sites wherever possible, and a maximisation of affordable and social housing on those sites.

Wherever homes are built, we have committed to making homes warmer and cheaper to heat with a ten-year emergency upgrade programme, as well as ensuring that all new homes are zero-carbon.

We’ll remove dangerous cladding from all buildings, while ensuring that leaseholders do not have to pay a penny towards it.

We will help people who struggle to afford a deposit to own their own homes by introducing a new Rent to Own model for social housing where rent payments give tenants an increasing stake in the property, owning it outright after 30 years.

Nick Cox (Green Party)

1. How do you anticipate being able to support residents’ ambitions to secure a high-quality development?

As both your MP and a district councillor I would be in a unique position to lobby and influence from multiple directions and this issue will remain in my in-tray for as long as necessary.

2. Will you champion the provision, by the developers, the NHS and service providers like Thames Water, of the community infrastructure needed by the development?

Yes, I am doing so already, and will continue to do so.

3. The community has prepared two neighbourhood plans… will you support the delivery of these plans and ensure that the voice of the community is not ignored but properly listened to by East Herts DC and the developers?

If I have learnt anything during my time as a district councillor, it is to avoid the word “ensure”, but I am happy to promise that I will commit to doing everything within my power.

4. … What steps do you think you will be able to take to secure an increase in affordable housing for local people?

The lack of affordable and social housing is a national disgrace and I will be lobbying Sir Keir’s Labour government to tackle the housing crisis. I don’t believe that green belt releases should be the solution. I believe in better use of brown field, ending the abhorrent practice of keeping homes empty to increase profits, and by driving foreign buy to let investors and other property speculators out of the domestic housing market.

Josh Dean (Labour Party)

1. How do you anticipate being able to support residents’ ambitions to secure a high-quality development?

As planning falls under the remit of the district council and, indeed, this development requires collaboration between a number of local authorities, it’s essential that any MP builds a strong relationship with the local authority and residential stakeholders. That is exactly what I would do as our MP.

Labour wants exemplary development to be the norm not the exception and in government we will take steps to ensure that we are building more high-quality, well-designed and sustainable homes and creating places that increase climate resilience and promote nature recovery.

2. Will you champion the provision, by the developers, the NHS and service providers like Thames Water, of the community infrastructure needed by the development?

It’s important that the growth of our infrastructure matches pace with the growth of our communities – this is something I have advocated for in the past and something I would advocate for if I am elected as our MP.

4…. What steps do you think you will be able to take to secure an increase in affordable housing for local people?

We desperately need more affordable housing in our communities as well as social housing to hep cut the waiting list. Like you, I’m concerned that the affordable housing target has been reduced to 23%. Labour has committed to strengthening planning obligations to ensure new developments provide more affordable homes and changing the Affordable Homes Programme to ensure that it delivers more homes from existing funding.

---

I appreciate that I haven’t been able to go into as much detail as I would like at this time. What I can promise is that I will always seek to engage in good faith with local residents on this issue and, if I am privileged enough to be elected as our MP on 4th July, I will prioritise holding an open meeting with local residents so we can have a longer discussion about this development, their views and how we can work together.

Jane Maria Fowler (Alliance for Democracy and Freedom)

To be totally honest I was against the development from the start.  We are losing far too much green space at an alarming rate as it is, and the amount of proposed houses to be built is huge and quite frankly frightening.

As you may or may not be aware I am very new to politics and learning new things everyday, so please forgive me as I do not have the answers you are looking for today and would have to do some research into the development.

If I was fortunate enough to be elected I would definitely support the community in all 4 points that have been raised.  I am particularly saddened to see the reduction in affordable housing and I would really get behind a campaign to reverse this decision as the lack of affordable housing for local people is one of reasons I decided to stand.

Hopefully whoever gets elected will pledge to help you and oversee the development making sure that you their constituents are happy that the points raised have been successfully implemented.

Barry Hensall (Heritage Party)

I understand the importance of your issues, however because of the amount of mail arriving I impress upon you to read our Manifesto that I whole heartedly support / agree with and hope this answers your questions.

I do hope you will put your trust in us, as by voting for the old LibLabCon party will just mean all will just stay the same or worse.

Julie Marson (Conservative Party)

1. How do you anticipate being able to support residents’ ambitions to secure a high-quality development?

I completely understand residents concern about the impacts that this development will have on landscape, the environment, and local heritage and existing communities. We are so lucky to live in an area that benefits from both rural beauty and farming as well as fantastic connections to urban areas like Cambridge and London. This is not something that I want to see blighted by ill thought out and rash developments. I will support the residents’ ambitions to see a high-quality development built by delivering on the Conservative manifesto promise to make sure that local authorities use the new Infrastructure Levy to deliver GP surgeries, roads, schools, and other local infrastructure. I echo the promise that we will not allow these funds to be spent on projects that bear no relation to support for new homes. I have a track record of action in this area, as I have raised issues with the Secretary of State (including supporting three call in requests) and successive Housing ministers in order to make sure that the ambitions and voices of constituents are fully heard and reflected in projects like these.

2. Will you champion the provision, by the developers, the NHS and service providers like Thames Water, of the community infrastructure needed by the development?

Developments like the Harlow and Gilston Garden Town will not be successful without the implementation of community infrastructure that supports it. Residents living in the development deserve equal access to services such as healthcare and education. I will hold developers account to their promises to make sure that both the residents of the Garden Town are adequately supported, but also to ensure that the quality of life for residents of the surrounding areas is not disrupted. I have a track record of action and support and have always sought to represent constituents – and the Gilston Garden Town development is no exception to this.

3. The community has prepared two neighbourhood plans… will you support the delivery of these plans and ensure that the voice of the community is not ignored but properly listened to by East Herts DC and the developers?

Over the last 4 and a half years I have worked with local authorities in other areas of the constituency in cases like this to ensure that the voices of local residents are heard. I have been working to secure a solution at Rush Green roundabout near Hertford to ameliorate traffic issues. Similarly, I vehemently oppose the proposed commercial development at the St James’ Park site in Bishop’s Stortford, echoing sentiments of local residents regarding concerns of health and safety. I have also been pressuring Frontier to follow through on their commitment to build a GP surgery for the residents of Stortford Fields as promised, speaking in Westminster and questioning the Health Minister on this matter. I will do the same for the residents of the existing communities around the Gilston development.

4. … What steps do you think you will be able to take to secure an increase in affordable housing for local people?

As a nation, we need more sustainably built housing so the next generation will be able to work for the privilege of becoming homeowners. Since 2010, the Conservatives have delivered over 696,100 new affordable homes, including over 482,000 affordable homes for rent, of which over 172,600 homes for social rent. We will continue with measures like cutting stamp duty and government backed Help to Buy schemes, making it easier for local people to get on the housing ladder. We will renew the Affordable Homes Programme which allocates grant funding to Housing Associations and Local Authorities to help mitigate the costs of developing affordable homes.

As you may know, your Neighbourhood Plan Group wrote to Secretary of State Michael Gove in March 2023 requesting that he “call-in” the decisions by East Herts Council that month to wave through the outline planning applications for 10,000 homes in Gilston, and instead put them to a public enquiry. 

You can download and read our letter here, where we underlined that we’re far from NIMBYs or a “protest group” trying to block the principle of this development. We’re essentially a collection of local residents who want this development to be the best it can be. We’re also a group founded by your elected parish councillors who have developed a Neighbourhood Plan backed by an overwhelming majority at referendum.

It’s sadly a fact that the plans from Places for People and Taylor Wimpey do not properly respect the principles on which the Green Belt land was released, nor the policies of your Neighbourhood Plan. The proposed affordable housing numbers have been slashed, while the plans also ignore the concerns of the existing community and pose a very real threat to local NHS services.

Disappointingly our call-in request has been refused by Mr Gove. The reasoning provided was: “The Government remains committed to giving more power to councils and communities to make their own decisions on planning issues and believe that planning decisions should be made at the local level wherever possible.”

Since we requested the “call-in” in March a lot has happened:

1. A review has been undertaken of the Developers’ crucial financial viability assessment. The previous assessment led to the cutback of 1,700 affordable homes and contributions developers have to make to support the project, but the new review argues that there is an apparent disparity of as much as £411 million. That’s enough not just to reinstate the 1,700 affordable homes but also deliver a huge amount of additional community infrastructure.
2. In May, the voters of East Herts kicked out the Conservatives and voted in a new coalition of Greens and Liberal Democrats to run the council. The residents of Hunsdon, Eastwick & Gilston were at the forefront of this electoral shift. The new administration has been in control for over six months and is no doubt still finding its feet. However, so far they have shown no inclination to influence the Gilston planning process, to reflect the disquiet of the voters with the old council’s decisions. Councillors can ask to be briefed about S106 obligations (the agreement between a developer and a local planning authority about measures that they must take to reduce their impact on the community) being agreed and verify that the best decisions are made in the interest of the local area, existing and future residents.
3. Meanwhile, Places for People and Taylor Wimpey are pressing on with their plans for the Gilston Area. The next step is Masterplanning. This is the key opportunity in the process for our communities to engage and contribute to what the new villages and their surroundings will look like. The NPG will be pressing for the implementation of the housing policies in the Neighbourhood Plan but everybody should feel free to go along to see for themselves and give the developers your views. 

Within the Gilston Area, communities are very well-informed and have demonstrated time and again that they understand local issues and local character very well. You have always turned out in great numbers when there was a genuine will to listen and move forward. 

Local people care about their environment, and about what makes the area special. Change is inevitable, but it does not have to happen by making Gilston like everywhere else. The Neighbourhood Plan you voted for summarises many of the aspirations of the local community, and the consideration of its policies are a way to deliver the development quality the area deserves.

We invite residents to get in touch with council Leader, Ben Crystall, and also their local councillors and remind them that there are opportunities to improve this development.

We would urge you to remind Mr Crystall that it would be proper to bring back some of the key decision making to the council’s Development Management Committee, rather than giving it all up to Officers who aren’t so accountable to local people as your elected Councillors.

As your Neighbourhood Plan Group, we also call on Ben Crystall to re-examine the Financial Viability Case put forward by the Developers, in the light of the recent Review, and see why 1,700 Affordable Homes and other contributions have been lost to East Herts. Time is short for this to be done but it is not too late if they act promptly.

The opportunity for further scrutiny should not be passed by, and councillors have the power to ask further questions and ensure that, both for the current and all future viability checks, the accepted original assumptions are verified and put to the test.

The people of East Herts can still have a say, if you email:

• East Herts Council Leader Ben Crystall (ben.crystall@eastherts.gov.uk) 
• Deputy Leader Mione Goldspink (mione.goldspink@eastherts.gov.uk)
• Executive Member for Planning Vicky Glover-Ward (vicky.glover-ward@eastherts.gov.uk)
• Chair of the Planning Committee Yvonne Estop (yvonne.estop@eastherts.gov.uk) 
• Councillor John Dunlop [Hunsdon Ward] (john.dunlop@eastherts.gov.uk)

Please don’t delay.

Anthony Bickmore – Chair, Hunsdon, Eastwick and Gilston Neighbourhood Plan Group

November 2, 2023

Join us at 10.30am on Saturday, July 1 at The Plume of Feathers in Gilston

The Neighbourhood Plan Group is making a vital attempt to improve and change the proposed new housing developments by asking the Government to “call in” the planning application for review.

If this happens we need to give a real example of what we think “good” looks like

Whatever the outcome of the Call-in, a community-backed alternative plan should feed key inputs into the developers’ masterplanning for the project.

This event is being facilitated by planning and design experts Create Streets.

Why are we doing this now?

The recent change in the makeup of East Herts Council offers a real chance to get our voices heard.

It’s no secret that a driving reason for the electoral shift is your dissatisfaction with the planning process and outcomes for local developments, especially those planned in Hunsdon, Eastwick and Gilston.

Residents had no choice but to accept the District Plan, which provided for the release of Green Belt land for 10,000 homes, with the promise of a development of exceptional quality and 1,000 acres of community-owned space in return.

In the years since this decision was made, the developers have been allowed to go back on their promises when it comes to affordable housing, the mitigation of impacts on existing communities, and the timely provision of adequate infrastructure to new and existing residents.

Despite this the previous Planning Committee of the council waved through the Outline Planning Applications, overruling the Neighbourhood Plan that you voted for by an overwhelming majority.

Can we really change anything?

Your Neighbourhood Plan Group has petitioned the Secretary of State to “call-in” this decision, as we’ve not been happy with how the council has approached it. We’ll keep on pushing on your behalf for this to happen and let you know the results of these efforts.

The District Plan can’t be overturned, and it’s still much more likely than not that the development will go ahead in some form – but the shifting political landscape on both a national and local level has opened the door for a fresh look at the project.

We’ve been approached by the Create Streets research institute, who want to help us come up with and develop our thinking for what might be within a future Masterplan – as one that chimes with the Neighbourhood Plan policies, and one that actually delivers on those promises of seven distinct villages that respond to the Hertfordshire landscape, rather than a road-led suburban sprawl.

With your help, we want to develop this Masterplan – one that comes from you, the residents – to present to the new East Herts Council and, possibly, the Secretary of State to show that another way is possible.

Please come along, and bring your neighbours and local friends and family.

 – Hunsdon, Eastwick and Gilston Neighbourhood Plan Group

Earlier this week, the Hunsdon, Eastwick and Gilston Neighbourhood Plan Group asked four questions of the local election 2023 candidates for Hunsdon Ward to let residents know their thoughts regarding the proposed Development of 10,000 houses in this Ward.

Below we have published the complete, unedited responses from Julia Davies (Liberal Democrats), John Dunlop (Green Party) and Salvatore Pagdades (Conservative Party).

We are currently awaiting responses from Hilary Durbin (Labour) and will add their answers to this article as and when they are provided.

Julia Davies (Liberal Democrats)

1. Have you supported the community on this Call-In and will you continue to do so, if elected. How will you do this? If you do not support us, please say why.

I do support this attempt to call in the planning application.  Now that the government has ended the minimum number of houses required each year I believe it could have some effect.  I have always opposed this enormous development which will totally change this part of East Herts.  When I attended the original meetings about the Local Plan which were held at Wallfields and Parish Councillors were invited to give their views there was not going to be development North of Gilston. The number of houses which is now planned is far more than was agreed and the proportion of affordable is much lower. 

As a Stanstead Abbotts Parish Councillor I have always protested about this development – not least because of the difficulties crossing the Stort and accessing Harlow Station.  In the last two or three years we have had the added issue that in the remaining green belt between Village 7 and Stanstead Abbotts there will almost certainly be a quarry.

2. If elected, how will you try to influence the delivery of the Gilston project over your term in office?

I would work hard to impress upon both District and County Councils that transport has to meet the needs of the whole family and that educational establishments and healthcare must be easily accessed.  I am particularly concerned that in their enthusiasm for fewer cars to be used that life will be very difficult for parents unless there is a huge improvement in the reliability of buses between Hertford, Harlow and Bishop’s Stortford.

3. Please tell us about your experience in shaping major developments.

My experience of planning is all related to the Stanstead Abbotts and St Margarets Neighbourhood Plan – I have chaired the Steering Group since the beginning in 2016.  We have just finished Regulation 14 and hope to be ready for a referendum by the end of the year.

4. What do you see as the biggest three risks and what are the three biggest gains from this development?

One risk is that there will be over-demand on the water supply which is vulnerable to the droughts we have recently been having reducing the level of the aquifer.

Secondly there is a risk that the sewage will not be treated satisfactorily if Rye House has to cope with so many more customers.

Thirdly the traffic using the A414 will vastly increase and there will be considerable pollution from the extra cars both during construction and afterwards.

Clearly the need for new housing has been identified and is crucial to reduce the numbers of homeless people.

There could be some revitalising of Harlow Town Centre which is in a rather sad state at the moment.

Hopefully the extra housing will ensure that a new hospital will follow which will be of benefit to us all.

John Dunlop (Green Party)

My name is John Dunlop, I am standing in the local elections on the 4th May 2023, to be your Green Party councillor. I have been asked by the Hunsdon, Eastwick and Gilston Neigbourhood Planning Group (HEGNPG) to give answers to the four questions (see below). Thank you for the opportunity to allow me to reach out to the community who have an interest in the Gilston area developments.

1. Have you supported the community on this Call-In and will you continue to do so, if elected. How will you do this? If you do not support us, please say why.

Absolutely, I have supported this Call-In by writing to the Conservative MP Julie Marson. I have also written to several newspapers and media outlets.

As a newly elected councillor representing the people of the Hunsdon Ward, a member of the Hunsdon, Eastwick and Gilston Neighbourhood Planning Group (HEGNPG) and resident of Terlings Park I will continue to support this Call-In by working closely with Parish councils and HEGNP Group by representing and promoting their views within the wider council.

2. If elected, how will you try to influence the delivery of the Gilston project over your term in office?

Prior to the East Herts Development Management Committee (DMC) meeting for Outline Planning Approval I discussed the main issues around infrastructure, transport, phasing and aesthetic with Ben Crystal our Green Party representative on the DMC. He subsequently voted against approval based in part on my requests and comments.

If elected, I would make it a priority to attend local meetings including Parish Council and NPG meetings to listen and understand the key issues and challenges for local residents and to talk to residents about the issues. With that understanding go back to East Herts Council (EHC) and raise these issues at both council and future planning meetings.

I would also want to ensure that I am on all master planning committee groups for each of the village applications so that along with HEGNPG I can provide a direct line between residents and planning officers and lobby for change whenever the community identifies that an alteration is needed.

It is also possible that I could be on the DMC, depending on numbers (the more Green councillors the better the chance), so that I can have a direct influence on the planning process, ensuring that there is proper scrutiny of all future decisions and push for change where needed.

3. Please tell us about your experience in shaping major developments.

This is my first experience in shaping a major development; I believe that my background puts me in a good place to influence events.

I worked in the Broadcasting Industry for 30+ years and have a good understanding of communications which is a key part of a Councillors role, ensuring the residents are fully informed and updated in helping to bring the community along with positive changes, and opposing those which need to be changed.

I also have a Galileo Master Certificate in Renewable energy, I come from a building family and grew up in the construction and agricultural industries and more recently qualified as a soil scientist. I have a keen interest in community as a volunteer for Harlow Foodbank, Bounty Club, PACT for Autism and Herts and Essex Community Farm. I will draw on experience of fellow councillors and the Neighbourhood Planning Group.

My aspirations and vision are to make this a place with a happy thriving multi-generation community, one where people want and feel proud to be, and which enhances the lives of those who are already living here.

4. What do you see as the biggest three risks and what are the three biggest gains from this development?

The risks and benefits of this scheme are two sides of the same coin. On the one side if the risks are not managed they will undermine some of the benefits; on the other side if the benefits are not ‘genuine’ or there is a lack of accountability they may be poorly implemented or absent, with very little avenue for redress.

The biggest risks as I see it are that:

• The developer pulls out before key infrastructure is completed or fails to be held to account for their agreed responsibilities and legal obligations
• Ambitious transport modal shift plans are dropped or fail and the whole area becomes snarled with traffic
• EHC and Harlow do a deal to release further Green Belt land to expand HGGT, or that the organisation tasked with long term management of the site decides to put profit above community and sell off further land for building etc. . There are many risks with this development and with my experience of investment committees in other industries, this, as it stands, would not be approved. I am genuinely surprised that the current Council have chosen to expose themselves to so much risk. The biggest potential gains which will require change from the current plan are:

• That the transport modal shift plan succeeds and there is a genuine shift towards sustainable modes which has a knock-on-effect for the area
• That the planned green spaces and biodiversity net gain do deliver for the area and despite the dense housing, there are genuine improvements in accessible green spaces and environment around the built up areas which everyone in the ward can enjoy
• The neighbourhood facilities, such as doctors surgeries, schools, shops, community clubs, promised improvements in infrastructure all come as promised and the current stresses on medical services, water, sewage etc are reduced locally.

Salvatore Pagdades (Conservative Party)

1. Have you supported the community on this Call-In and will you continue to do so, if elected. How will you do this? If you do not support us, please say why.

Whilst I have not been involved in the call-in process to date, I would support the local community if elected, because I believe it’s important that a development as large as this is properly assessed, and local residents’ concerns are addressed.

2. If elected, how will you try to influence the delivery of the Gilston project over your term in office?

If elected, I would work with local residents to ensure their views are represented on East Herts District Council (and to Hertfordshire County Council). This requires working collaboratively with the councils rather than combatively. I would also attend local meetings to listen to the views of the residents and update them on my work on the Council.

3. Please tell us about your experience in shaping major developments.

As a young person, I don’t have lots of experience in shaping major planning developments; but I do have experience of working with local groups and residents to represent their views and push for improvements. A recent example is where I’ve worked with councillors in Sawbridgeworth to object to a travellers site off High Wych Road.

4. What do you see as the biggest three risks and what are the three biggest gains from this development?

From my perspective, the three biggest risks from the development are disruption to existing residents; loss of green belt; and potential impact on environmental elements like drainage. The three biggest gains are: provision of more homes, which will help more young families get on the housing ladder; an improvement in local amenities and facilities; and improved transport links around the area.

East Herts District Council elections May 2023 – Hunsdon Ward

Four open questions from the Hunsdon Eastwick & Gilston Neighbourhood Plan Group to all candidates about the proposed Development of 10,000 houses in this Ward. As you will know, the EHC District Plan 2018 released hundreds of acres of Green Belt in the Ward for at least 3,000 houses up to 2033 and 7,000 afterwards.

East Herts Council has this year granted outline planning permission and increased the numbers pre 2033 to 4,700 houses. HEGNPG on behalf of their Parish Councils and other parties have requested the Secretary of State, Michael Gove, to “call-in” that decision so that the plans can be properly reassessed at a Public Inquiry.

1. Have you supported the community on this Call-In and will you continue to do so, if elected. How will you do this? If you do not support us, please say why.

2. If elected, how will you try to influence the delivery of the Gilston project over your term in office?

3. Please tell us about your experience in shaping major developments.

4. What do you see as the biggest three risks and what are the three biggest gains from this development?

Questions and responses will be published on our website and neighbourhood sites/local press.

Anthony Bickmore, Chairman NPG

24th April 2023